Bonus Score: Three Methods

Kevin, over at BlogHouston, caught this article at 740 KTRH.

City controller Annise Parker says indications are that the payments just fell through the cracks within City Hall bureaucracy. She say [sic] part of the problem may be that Houston currently has three different methods of approving bonuses.

Now, I’m aware of two. One is to game the base pay, as I explained before. The other is the simplified Performance Pay system we saw used in Bonusgate. But what is the third? That I don’t know.

Still, the part that caught my eye was the blurb. Assuming it’s not been rendered as inaccurately as a Chronicle headline (or constitutional analysis), it seems to suggest that perhaps HR was not bypassed after all.

Some $130,000 in bonuses for four Houston employees appear to have been approved by at least three separate city departments.

The four offices involved would be the Mayor Pro Tem’s office, HR, F&A/Payroll, and the Controller’s office. Assuming the MP-T’s office doesn’t count here, that leaves three, which means the bonuses did go through Human Resources, at least part of the time. Curiouser and curioser.

But stay tuned for an early post tomorrow; I just discovered that two of my favorite subjects of late have something in common: each other.

Edit: unfortunately, I’ve been bitten on the butt by computer problems again. There will be a delay of about 24 hours. Sorry all. ðŸ™

Update 2/22: The bonus payments bypassed HR. But the $21k in permanent raises went through the usual channel.

Get a .Clue

So I was hanging out over at J. Greely’s place. He’s an online buddy of Steven Den Beste (who is finally back online about 24 hours after I decided he wasn’t coming back!), and a high level tech-geek. His blog tends to have some interesting things much of the time (as opposed to this one, which is only interesting some of the time). Today he’s linked to a site for a children’s book, “Why Mommy is a Democrat.” Except he titles it “A Republican Victory In 2008.”

Here’s a link to three sample pages. All I have to say is that if you don’t see why this promotes Republicans, you must be a Democrat. Or too young to know.

I was faintly amused at the author’s last paragraph in his biography:

I currently live in Madison, Wisconson, with my partner Julia, her daughter Isabella (age six) and our cat Zachary — all lifelong Democrats.
(emphasis added)

This may explain why there wasn’t a page in the book saying “Democrats promote family values and committment through marriage.” I mean, I’m no blue-nose, and don’t have a problem with shacking up as such, but when there’s kids invovled, I think you need to make a damn committment to being around and raising them. That to me = marriage, not “yo mama’s my ho.”

Democrats, get a .clue.

That’s Obvious. Except When It’s Not.

The Chronicle had an editorial on Bonusgate for the Sunday edition. Perhaps I’m still waking up today, but it didn’t seem to say a whole lot that’s not obvious. Carol Alvarado should have exercised better oversight. Someone may have covered for them in payroll. The current security arrangements were breached.

Yawn.

Of course I have a kneejerk reaction to seeing the words “Employee Greed” in such large letters, but I can’t object too much when it’s true in this case. I would rather it have read “Employees’ Greed” since the lack of a possessive leaves the impression that all employees are greedy. Hey, I’m not greedy. I just want to win a big lottery and have a couple of sex-crazed supermodels at my beck and call. What’s greedy about that?

Here’s the paragraph I locked in on, though:

Continue reading

“No Effort At All To Hide This”

Events are overtaking my ablity to blog about them fast enough. Late Saturday, the Chronicle posted an update to their Friday article discussing the forgery of Carol Alvarado’s initials.

Once again, the city reacted with unusual speed to a TPIA request, responding during a meeting of the Chronicle editorial board with Ms. Alvarado.

The memo, obtained through the Texas Public Information Act, was faxed to the Chronicle during the editorial board meeting from the office of City Controller Annise Parker.

The dramatic exchange marked the first time, Alvarado said, that she has seen the document. “This is forgery,” she said.

Parker said the memo was one of a series that requested bonuses totaling $130,000 since 2004.

This marks the entry of City Controller Parker into the fray, although she is only providing requested information and the basics of how the bonuses were paid out. And a little dig at Ms. Alvarado, as we’ll see below. It also has some bearing on my earlier comment:

While I assume that the process is mostly automated, it says something about the lack of oversight and built-in safeguards that no alarm was raised when special checks started being cut for tens of thousands of dollars to employees.

From the Chronicle:

On Friday, Parker provided the first account of how the bonuses were approved.

The memo she provided, dated Jan. 10 and addressed from Alvarado to payroll employee Alice Ravin, is like numerous others investigators are examining, Parker said.

Chronicle\'s copy of the memo
I’m archiving a clipped version of the Chronicle’s picture here, since their link may disappear after a few days.

It appears that this is slightly different from the mechanism that I described the other day, as these are clearly indicated as additional pay, not a pay scale adjustment. That indicates to me that they’ve been doing this so much in some departments that a simplified SOP was developed; they don’t have to “game” the base pay anymore. Also, I clipped the page to save bandwidth but the amounts of the bonuses were $2k and less; it’s just that they did it almost every pay period.

“Everything was documented as though it was completely legitimate and supported,” Parker said. “There was a complete trail. … There was no effort at all to hide this.”

But it’s this part that caught my attention:

Parker, who questioned why Alvarado or someone on her staff hadn’t recognized the bloated payroll figures,

Probably because the staff were the ones doing it, and Alvarado delegated everything to them?

. . .the controller’s office red-flagged one series of payments last spring. Payroll officials then indicated that the requests were legitimate, she said.

Clearly, an alarm was raised, after all, but someone silenced it. It is barely possible that some incurious soul in the payroll office just looked to see that the paperwork was in order and didn’t bother going any further. But if I had to bet, I’d go with the odds being slightly in favor of someone covering for them.

Note the dig at Ms. Alvarado’s lack of oversight. She is definately being thrown to the wolves by everyone except her current collegues and the Mayor. Quan and Goldberg have spoken out, but neither are presently council members. So. . . . has anyone asked former mayor Brown for his opinion on the supervisory qualities of his former assistant?

Another thing that caught my attention:

The Chronicle reported in 2000 that some council members had given their employees bonuses ranging from $100 to $1,100. Some council members also have given surplus funds back to city departments.

Nah…. Quit dreaming, they’re not reading this blog. 🙂

In her meeting at the Chronicle, Alvarado said she authorized a 2 percent pay increase for some pro tem office employees in 2004. She also said she granted a later raise, but she couldn’t remember the details.

Let’s see, we, the rank and file, got what for raises? 1% Was that 2004, or 2005; I have trouble remembering these huge windfalls. (I was fortunate enough to be on the director’s short list for that one.)

Another document obtained Friday by the Chronicle shows that Alvarado granted three employees — Hernandez, Watkins and James Rodriguez, her district office chief of staff — the authority to sign documents on her behalf, using their own names. But that authority does not grant any employee the right to use her signature.

This is not an uncommon practice in our department. . . when someone is going to be out of the office for more than a day. Such authority is always for a limited time. Our auditors get really hinky if people with improper authority levels start signing off on documents, especially if money is involved. Of course if you’re a council member, I imagine auditors don’t bother you that much, because they all work for F&A. Council members might get a bit annoyed if bureaucrats working for the mayor spend too much time looking over their shoulders. (Special auditors work for the Controller’s office, but I’m talking about the normal oversight.)

And finally, one last, humorous aside. The handwriting expert brought in by the Chronicle was absolutely adamant that one sample of each wasn’t enough to make any determinations as to forgery or authenticity. Very much so. Clearly they should have let CBS find them a different expert. Isn’t Dan Rather up in Austin these days? I’m sure he’d give them some advice. . . .

I am so mean. 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

For Whom the Poll(ster) Toils

Got polled this morning on union-related subjects. Although the pollster denied it, the phrasing of the questions indicated to me that they were affiliated with the AFSCME or AFL-CIO. A lot of the early questions were about working conditions, etc, but as the questions got more specific, they started being slanted so as to refer to the SEIU negatively. Also got a new mailer in yesterday:




Curiously, one of the poll questions was “Do you feel that either of the unions is running a negative campaign against the other?” Gosh, what might make me think that….

In a brief administrative note, I promised some data today and intend to post on an article Kevin Whited over at BlogHouston pointed out, but it looks like it will be delayed, as I have to deal with a malfunctioning computer. Sorry all. ðŸ™

HPD, Phone Home

No, I haven’t overlooked this little story due to Bonusgate.

Emanuel is an inspector for Houston Police Department’s Neighborhood Protection.

“His supervisors have told me they’re conducting an inquiry,” said Lt. Robert Manzo, HPD.

11 News discovered the city is not collecting hundreds, perhaps thousands of dollars from employees who make personal calls on their city cell phones.

It’s just that there’s really not much to add. Ten years ago, if/when I made long distance calls on a city phone, I would receive a report a few months later. It was my responsibiltiy to mark off any calls that were personal business and attach a check to reimburse the City of Houston. Although city policy was and remains that you don’t make personal calls from city phones, sometimes there really isn’t any choice; you’re disputing a credit card bill and the company can only be contacted during regular business hours, or you’ve got to talk to an insurance company, but it’s not toll free, etc. Managers understand that life stubbornly refuses to be lived between the lines, and as long as our work got done and we reimbursed the city, everything was ok.

Continue reading

Waiting on the Other Shoe

Well, Bonusgate continues to bubble away not so quietly, so I’ve got some random musings on the matter today. This morning’s Chronicle online has some interesting information — and the usual goofs. All those layers of checks and editing, you know.

Alvarado inherited three of the four employees from her predecessor as mayor pro tem, former Councilman Gordon Quan. She hired the office supervisor, a longtime city employee who worked with her in former Mayor Lee Brown’s office.

Ah yes, the administration of Outta Town Brown. Now there’s a gift that keeps on taking. As I’ve said before, we’re going to be paying for Brown for about the next 20 years, and I’m not just talking about all the shiny sports arenas and railroads that got built during his term. (Oh, but those aren’t city projects! Right, and how far do you think they’d have gotten if he opposed them? Remember, the City of Houston appoints a majority of the Metro board, and had lots of legal and infratstructure work for the arenas.) Don’t forget, as Royko over at BlogHouston just reminded me this morning, Alvarado herself is a product of the Brown administration.

Apparently, she learned about delegation from her former boss. From Housnitch:

Ms. Alvarado oversees the following departments on behalf of Mayor Brown: Library, Parks and Recreation, Solid Waste and the Citizen’s Assistance Office.

Errrrrr, maybe I’m off base here, but I thought that’s what the directors of those departments were for?

In the Chronicle article, she says:

“My responsibility, once something is brought to my attention, is to correct it, to make sure procedures are put in place, to make sure that something like this never happens again.”

While I eagerly await her action plan to foil further attempts to steal city funds and embarrass rank-and-file employees such as myself, I’d also like to know, what about the repsonsibility of seeing to it that it didn’t happen in the first place?

And of course, no Chronicle article would be complete without a totally misleading piece of information:

Ellis’ office takes over
Meanwhile, the office was up and running. Longtime council staffer Carolyn Layce, who last ran former Councilman Mark Ellis’ office, will oversee the operation for now, according to a memo from Alvarado.

Uh, if Ellis is a former councilman, how is his office taking over? As the 2nd setence states, a former Ellis staffer has been placed in charge. Not Ellis, and as should be obvious from the fact that Alvarado sent the memo, she is still in charge of the office; in fact Mark Ellis has not one damn thing to do with it, at least directly. I’m certainly in no position to know if he’s giving advice behind the scenes, something several principals could evidently use.

The memo also asked Johnson and City Attorney Arturo Michel “for guidance in implementing control measures to prevent any further payroll irregularities and wrongdoing.”

Read. The. Budget. Reports.

And, having “waved the hand” towards the Gang of Four, the administration has decided to sit on both hands and zip the lips.

Top city officials, including Mayor Bill White, Controller Annise Parker, Finance and Administration Director Judy Gray Johnson and her deputy over payroll, Barbara Glick, also refused to discuss the matter.

Patrick Trahan, a spokesman for the mayor, said the administration would have no response to a list of e-mailed questions about payroll procedures in the pro tem office.

So, Annise Parker is also keeping mum. I have an unusual way of looking at things; I get worried when the Mayor and the Controller aren’t fighting. Our odd form of government, with the two offices being seperate, is designed to keep these two in conflict; the Controller is essentially a watchdog on the Mayor. This led to the famous quote by Mayor Brown: “Mayor, Management. Controller, Finances.” when his, ah, budgetarily-challenged practices caused run-ins with Annise’s predecessor.

A final note: I was thinking Quan was still a current council member; he’s not. Generally, I have avoided commenting on high-profile cases and political affairs at that level, due to the obvious dangers to myself. So, I rarely pay close attention to the exact composition of the council. If it hadn’t been for all the paper we threw out every two years, I wouldn’t even notice.

Ok, that’s not really true, but I just wanted to work that last bit in about throwing out paper.

The official city letterhead has all the council members’ names at the bottom. So every time there was a change, we had to throw out all the old stationary and order boxes of the new. That meant every two years, or in the case of Sekula-Gibbs marriage, three years running. (Her wedding occured in an off-year between elections). Hideously wasteful. I’m happy to say that Mayor White put a stop to that nonsense by having the electronic files that make up the letterhead and footer distributed to all departments in Word.doc format.

Update: Rick Casey weighs in, suggesting Carol Alvarado should hope this game is played by basketball rules, not baseball.

Update 2: Meanwhile, our alternative press thinks its very important that we understand why Houston bands always self-destruct on the verge of success. Not that I expected them to have anything relevant to say, but I felt they needed a swift poke. (Because I didn’t expect them to have anything relevant to say.) But I was interested in finding out what their columnist thought of women who record the sounds of men defecating.

Not.

Bonusgate: The Gift That Keeps On Giving!

Giving me fun things to post about that is! Wheeeee! Never thought I’d get to hang a “–gate� moniker on anything! I’m tickled; hope I’m the first to use it.

Ok, now that I’ve gotten past the silly back-patting, lets get on with some additional information and speculation about those mysterious bonuses. Early reports are often the least accurate, but some of the first blurbs yesterday indicated that the investigation actually started with a whistleblower report to the OIG’s office; in turn they came to F&A, who advised the mayor. I note that the information released by the mayor in his press conference (as much as has been broadcast or placed on websites to view) does not contradict this sequence of events, although clearly, some parties would like to leave the impression that the information flow went the other way; F&A called in OIG. From the speed of things, I think OIG got ready, then informed F&A and the Mayor’s office. Which is kind of interesting; I’m sure the Feds didn’t call up Skilling and tell him “hi, we’ll be by tomorrow to seize all the computers in your energy trading offices!” Maybe some of Chief Hurtt’s cameras could tell us if anyone dropped by the Pro-Tem’s office late that evening. Like at 3 a.m. or so.

Well, informing them was probably just to gather information from F&A’s payroll office.

Note that the most silent party in all this is the City Controller’s office—the ones who actually cut the checks. While I assume that the process is mostly automated, it says something about the lack of oversight and built-in safeguards that no alarm was raised when special checks started being cut for tens of thousands of dollars to employees. And Ms. Parker has yet to be heard from.

Continue reading

City “Invalidates” SEIU Petitions

A little birdie somewhere insdie the SEIU managed to smuggle out a really bad copy of the City of Houston’s Legal Department response to the SEIU petitions. AFSCME wasted no time crowing about SEIU’s failure, in an email to all employees.

City of Houston Employees are closer to winning the better pay and benefits we deserve through AFSCME NOW!

The City of Houston rejected the petitions of the Service Employees union (SEIU) because:

1) SEIU did not have enough support (signatures) to ask to be recognized.

2) SEIU is not a recognized employee association.

AFSCME NOW is a real union, with real petitions working to build a real majority of City of Houston Employees.

– SEIU does not have enough petition signatures.

– All SEIU petitions have been deemed invalid and are being returned.

– “The Petition failed to meet the requirements of Section 146.004(a)…

– The City will not proceed further in processing the petition for the reasons stated above.”

Sincerely,

Jill Scott
AFSCME NOW!

However, a carefull reading of the letter itself shows that #2 is not exactly correct. Letter and analysis below the fold.

Continue reading

The City Points Fingers

The City of Houston has provided a load of information to the local media. Information drawn from KHOU’s 10:00 news, gives the identities of the four employees as:

  • Christopher Mays, pay $40k/yr. — I think he’s an Admin Specialist, i.e.: mid level paper pusher. He is said to be very helpful to all the other council offices with their payroll issues. (I can testify, the paperwork is a stone cold bitch.)
  • Rosita Hernandez, Administration Manager, pay $72k/yr. — the boss of the office and hand-picked by Carol Alvarado to run it.
  • Theresa Orta, Receptionist, pay $29k/yr. — that may have been her duty, but it probably wasn’t her job title because receptionists don’t get that kind of pay without being in 4th quartile (top 25% of pay bracket). Then again, considering where she works, I won’t rule it out.
  • Florence Watkins, pay $50k/yr. — I’m uncertin of her title or duties, but she’s mid-manager pay level.

One thing is very curious–the above names, and copies of some of the evidence were made available to KHOU and other stations. Normally, when a whistle gets blown, it’s handled quietly. Names aren’t named, and civil service rules are cited to keep everything under wraps. It usually takes days and TPIA requests for the media to get hold of any solid information, let alone evidence. (Edit: I have unconfirmed word that the information was made available through TPIA requests. Bear in mind that this is incredibly fast response.) Yet in this case, the administration seems to be going out of its way provide the information. Moreover, within a half-day, the administration had all its ducks in a row and the appropriate people briefed for interviews, etc. Contrast that to the dismal performance of VP Cheney’s staff over a shooting. Granted, the smaller staff of a city should be more nimble, but the point is, someone made the effort to be ready for a full-court publicity press.

The big question is how far and in which direction this investigation will go; it has got to go somewhere in F&A/payroll. There’s almost no way they could have pulled this off solo, even with forged signatures. Alarm bells should have gone off in the payroll office of F&A. Eventually, they did, but how long did it take?

And will the investigation also move sideways into other council member’s offices? The Pro-Tem’s office is responsible for the procurement and payroll processing of all council members’ staffs. I’m suspicious over how much the administration is playing up these four and the amount of information willingly released to the press on the same day as the suspensions. The right hand is waving to distract us, but what is the left doing in the shadows?

Comrade, I don’t know about you, but ven the people’s commisars start holding showy public “events” like deeze, I become very vorried. Vat ist going on in ze dark, avey from ze lights?

And if lights start getting shined into dark corners, what will the political fallout be? Will White lose allies? Will some mayoral wannabe’s sense blood in the water? Both Quan and Goldberg are former Pro Tems, and both were (at least in the edited interviews seen on KHOU), careful and most restrained about sharpening their knives. But make no mistake, those knives were in hand. This could become White’s decisive battle of his second term.

This article was revised and augmented at 12:30 a.m., 2-16-06

Update, 2-16-06: From the Chronicle

The probe could widen, White said, as investigators try to determine how such transactions would have been arranged and whether they would require cooperation by those in other departments.

“It’s a betrayal of the public trust,” White said. “We will follow it through to the full extent of the law.”

Though some details were kept secret to protect the accused employees and the integrity of the investigation, White said Finance and Administration Director Judy Gray Johnson discovered payroll irregularities Tuesday evening.

The mayor said he immediately ordered the investigation, which is focused on payroll records from late 2004, 2005 and this year.

Bonuses rare, small
City employees do receive bonuses, though they are rare. They generally aren’t sizable, and paperwork requirements must be met before any payments are disbursed.

“By any stretch, compared to standards of government, these were improper bonuses,” White said.

Just for the record, city employees don’t receive bonuses. High ranking city managers and executive staff receive bonuses. I suppose, technically, they are employees too…..

Another curious point: the Chronicle refused to identify the four employees, because they have not been charged with any wrongdoing. KHOU on the other hand, gleefully identified all four, as I pointed out above. Also, there is a discrepancy of $6,000 in the amount of the office manager’s pay; the Chron says $78k; KHOU says $72k. But could someone explain why, in an office of four employees, two of them are managers? Clearly there’s an issue here with the authority needed to do a job, and the title that you have to have to do that job. Although I’ve not blogged about it before (it’s a fairly opaque and obscure issue), the city has problems with this up and down the line, especially with the personnel cutbacks of the last eight years. More and more authority has to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, and sometimes a person has to be given a manager’s title even if they don’t have any employees to manage, just to have the necessary authority to do their job.

Consolodation of authority also makes it easier to pull off little tricks like giving yourself large bonuses, too.

Update 3: From KHOU, quoted Gordon Quan, ex-Mayor Pro-Tem:

“It is possible, I suppose, that the staff did it without her knowledge, but if that happened they’re possibly looking at some jail time because they did not follow the procedures.,” said former Councilmember Mark Goldberg.

You hired three of the people who have been put on administrative leave. Had one of them under your direction been given a $50,000 bonus, would you have known that? That would double their salary. That would have had to come through me. I would have to sign off on that,” said former Mayor Pro Tem Gordon Quan.

Oh yes, the knives are being sharpened, but whose? What the article doesn’t make clear is that the emphasized part above is the KHOU reporter asking a question. The poor editing makes it look like Quan is saying that; possibly speaking about Alvarado. At the very least, it’s incredibly sloppy editing.

Some (self-made) Raises Already?

It seems that a few employees somehow managed to get in line first and get their raises way ahead of anyone else. Carol Alvarado’s office was raided by the police, computers seized, locks changed, and four employees suspended.

The timing of yesterday’s announcement looks even more curious. The paperwork to suspend four employees isn’t something that could be completed in a single afternoon. I suspect Mayor White is trying to head off an explosion at the pass. One of the things about the mess we’re in is that we’re all in it together. Of course, some of us are more equal than others, but this is the kind of thing that will have employees seeing red. For one thing, most are not going to believe that the employees cooked this scheme up themselves, no matter what the facts indicate. It’s going to be assumed that Alvarado herself had something to do with it.

Update: I’ll add more data as I get it. So far all I have is that the Mayor supposedly didn’t know until yesterday afternoon, and that the employees also gave themselves bonuses adding up to $100k. Analysis: Rank-and-file employees would peg Alvarado for the raises, but figuring out a way to game the system and get bonus checks would be seen as an employee-organized gig.

Update 2: Quote from KTRK: ‘Alvarado told Eyewitness News, “I am deeply disappointed to learn of these alleged irregularities. I support the investigation and fully intend to coorperate. I want to get to the bottom of this matter as quickly as possible. Let me also say that this investigation in no way involves members of my council district staff.”‘ Analysis: Carol is trying to distance herself from the scandal, obviously. She picks her counsil staff; but does she pick the pro tem staff? Although the article makes it sound like “council district staff” and “city employee” are two seperate things, in reality they are one and the same — with the exception that the former are not civil service and serve strictly at their council member’s pleasure. So if these employees are selected by Ms. Alvarado, the amount of “splash” will depend on the level of publicity given to that aspect by the local media. Whereas, if they are an independant civil service staff assigned to whomever the current Mayor Pro Tem is, the “splash” will be much more limited. Expect that latter aspect to played up (by White & Alvarado), regardless of the facts. I’ll be keeping a close eye on all this.
Note: Garbled versions of this denial had it that the mayor’s e-mail quoted this morning was false. No such credible report has been found as yet. The rumor mill grinds very fine, but it grinds anything it’s given…

Updates continued below the fold Continue reading

Don’t Say I Didn’t Do Anything For You

Oh look, its another “we’re not keeping up with inflation but want you to think we’re doing something for you” raise:

Dear City Employees:

I have directed the senior management of the City to implement a 1.5% pay raise for all full-time civilian employees to begin in April 2006. Eligible civilian employees will receive the pay hike effective April 1, for municipal pay cycle employees; and April 8, for Fire and Police pay cycle employees. The raises will appear on the checks received April 21 and April 28, respectively.

The 1.5% increase will be given to permanent, full-time civilian employees who were hired/rehired before or on October 1, 2005, and whose most recent Employee Performance Evaluation (EPE) rating is not less than 3.00.

In addition, I will propose a 2.0% pay allocation in the Fiscal Year 2007 Budget. Plans for the pay increase will be implemented at the beginning of the Fiscal Year, or the pay period following Council’s approval of the budget if that occurs after the beginning of the fiscal year. Each department is being asked to submit to me by June 12 a plan for how that money would be allocated. It could include some across-the-board pay increases for defined job categories and/or some merit pay, depending on what plan directors decide best suits the goals of their departments. Part-time employees, while not eligible for the 1.5% general increase, may be included in this FY ’07 plan, based on the recommendation of the management of each department.

You work hard to make City Hall efficient and responsive to those we work for, the citizens of Houston. Thank you. I am proud to be working with you.

Sincerely,

Bill White,

Mayor

For the record, inflation was 3.6% for the local area during calendar year ’05. Gotta wonder if we’d even be getting this if the union fights weren’t going on. I’m sure both of them will take credit for Mayor White’s “generosity.”

More Union Breaks

Two more unions have followed the SEIU’s lead in bolting from the AFL-CIO, citing its lack of focus on recruiting. More over at the Captain’s Quarters; original article at the NY Times. The impact on the Houston area will be negligible. Trying to unionize the construction industry here would be like trying to paint water; it’s just going to flow away from you.

DC Comics Remembers Its Roots

Oh, hell yeah.

It’s about damn time. And he’s the one guy you’d expect to go gunning for them too. (Well, aside from Nick Fury and S.H.I.E.L.D. Anyone know if Marvel has been paying attention?)

And it’s Frank Miller, too. Damn. I’ve got to make sure this is pre-ordered. I haven’t bought a comic in 15 years, but I’ll buy this one.

Seperation Doesn’t Mean Suppression

That the country operates on a principle of the seperation of church and state is a given. However, some jackasses seem to think that seperation means suppression. At least that’s the only explanation I can think of for this piece of crap:

A group of parents has obtained a temporary restraining order allowing their children, who are students in the Katy Independent School District, to take religious-themed valentines to school Tuesday. . . .the school has banned religious items from classrooms. The parents also filed a lawsuit claiming their children are subject to censorship and ridicule whenever they they talk about faith and religion in class.

Specifically, the suit alleges children were prohibited from drawing “religious images” in an art fundraiser, mentioning Jesus in a class discussion on Easter and handing out faith bracelets during recess. It specifically cites the alleged practices at Pattison Elementary School, and names the principal and a teacher.
(empahsis added)

How the holy hell do you have a serious discussion of Easter without Jesus?!?!? I mean, seriously, I figure the kids probably oversold their religion and got on someone’s nerves but ask yourself, what if they were as fanatic about drag racing? Would that subject be banned? Next thing you know, they’ll ban discussion of Christ at *****mas!

Hey, WTF? I said *****mas. What? *****mas! *****mas! Is the KISD running this blog? I can say *****mas if I want to ***dammit!

Well, fudge.

But don’t forget to understand and respect the Religion of Peace(tm), ‘cuz those mother-fuckers will burn your embassy down if you don’t. *****ians are too civilized for that sort of nonsense.

Edit: something I just realized: “. . to take religious-themed valentines. . .” Uh, they can’t even name the religion? Look at it again. If they didn’t say “Jesus” you wouldn’t know what religion is under discussion. The religion is unnamed; the word “Christian” does not appear anywhere in the article!