With Friends Like These, Who Needs Enemas?

I missed the Chron’s editorial page, but Kevin didn’t over at BlogHouston. Reading through the original, I think I’m going to have a few words to say. . . . but it will be late today before I can do a full review. This standout paragraph begs to be quoted now, though:

The investigation must also allow for Alvarado to clear her name by giving a full account of her role in what happened. By all accounts, Carol Alvarado had a promising political career ahead. She has been mentioned as a potential candidate for state senator, mayor and Congress. All of that goes down the drain if she is not allowed the opportunity to answer direct questions as part of the investigation. If Council Member Alvarado were not interviewed as part of the investigation, it would be a travesty bordering on a political cover-up.

No, Councilmember Vasquez, the investigation must find out what happened. If that allows Alvarado to “clear her name” well and good. If it doesn’t (as in, it reveals wrongdoing on her part), TFB. And just who is trying to deny her the opportunity to answer direct questions, which is what you seem to be hinting? Certainly not Houblog, for all that I’ve said the smartest thing she could do is shut up. Oh look, the victim card didn’t work, lets start waving the “shadowy conspiricy card.” And interviewed by whom, anyway? The DA? The OIG? I thought the second already had, and the first was still waiting on the whitewash report to be delivered?

I suppose this could be explained by the minority bloc closing ranks with one of their own, but it feels wrong, like there’s something else playing here. Just how big were the bonuses passed out back when Vasquez was in office? Someone was passing out “legitimate” bonuses of over $8,000 to their aides. (Edit: that’s a quarter of what I make in a year, folks. Yes, I’m a bit ticked off.)

And finally, in an unrelated matter, the Danger Train is not the Submarine Train. Glub.

Note: The title is correct in referring to Mr. Vasquez as a former council member. The blurb at the bottom of the op-ed piece is in error. He is the former council member for District H, which is now represented by Adrian Garcia.

Update: Is there any special reason this is front page news today? The Chron’s Washington bureau is certainly trying to earn its keep. “Yoo hoo! Never mind Alvarado, lookit this!” Is it a coincidence that $130k is the first number to appear in the article?

In April, the federal government spent more than $130,000 on food and lodging for lawmakers who attended the funeral of Pope John Paul II and later the installation of Pope Benedict XVI in Vatican City.

I think not. They had to reach back nearly a year for that one.

Weekend Roundup 2/26/06

Just a few quick notes for the weekend.

The SEIU reaches out:
Chron ad for SEIU

El Presidente, over at TSU proves that if you run an insitution with a worse graduation rate than most college football programs, you can also singlehandedly make City of Houston employees look like pikers. And be smart enough to shut up from the get-go.

Austin officials can’t tell the difference between ricin and something else, probably a cleaning/drying powder.

“I see a major trauma and monetary loss in your future…”

Melissa Ethridge will sub for Sheryl Crow at the Rodeo.

“We was thinking that the principal was going to notify the parents, and he was going to take action like (school officials) said they were going to do, but they didn’t,” said Yvette Williams, the 10-year-old victim’s cousin.

At Houblog, we was thinking you just gave parents another reason to send their kids to another school. Like maybe one with competent English (instead of Ebonics) teachers.

HPD officers decide Chief “Cameras on Every Corner” Hurtt shouldn’t get all the bad publicity while they’re trying to fill their quotas.

“Survey says . . . . ”

And I’ll be back late tomorrow or Tuesday with more fun. The Empire Strikes Back….

Update:Oh, dear God. Is this bitch still chasing the money?

“We didn’t go overboard, you just don’t understand the news!”

Ka-ching! New Jackpot: $143,000

The mess in the Pro Tem’s office is getting worse by the day it seems. As I noted a few days ago, Muni channel tapes indicate that Judy Johnson and Carol Alvarado agreed that someone from F&A would be assigned to the pro tem’s office full time in order to reconcile the budgets. This morning, Matt Stiles over at the Chronicle has a new article pointing out that the budget overruns happened despite that.

For some, the figures also raise questions about why city officials didn’t notice the budget overruns, especially while a Finance and Administration Department employee was assigned to compile spending reports for council offices, including the pro tem office, each month.

Alvarado has taken Houblog’s advice and choked on her own foot, rather than risked saying anything else foolish. All questions are now being referred, not to a city spokesperson, but to a political consultant, the once-powerful Marc Campos.

Mayor Pro Tem Carol Alvarado, who oversees the office in addition to her elected job representing council District I, says she wasn’t alerted. “That’s why they call them checks and balances,” said Marc Campos, Alvarado’s political consultant.

Okaaaaaay, I think we see why he’s “once-powerful.� That was helpful.

He questioned why city finance officials didn’t say, ‘Hey, we might have a problem there.’

So, it’s F&A’s fault that Alvarado hired a crook. Yeah, that’s helpful, all right.

The addition of a special assistant from the F&A office is rather odd to start with; I don’t think any other departments have that. And if they do, well, an entire department is a bit larger than the aggregate of 14 council members staffs plus the pro tem’s office. Still, it doesn’t seem to have helped.

And, with more than four months left in the fiscal year, the records show the office has spent all but $56,000 of its $326,000 budget.

Put another way, they have 18% of the budget left for 25% of the year. Gosh, I guess the bonuses were going to have to slow down anyway. Actually, considering that only $11,000 of that remainder was allocated to salaries, it was probably going to come completely unglued soon anyway.

“If these people were siphoning money for unauthorized bonuses and raises,” Michel wondered, “what was their plan for the final quarter, when the reality of what was in the account caught up to this?”

I only say ‘probably’ because this just doesn’t add up: with a special budget assistant from F&A, how is it the problem had to be revealed through employee gossip? Now, I don’t think that Johnson was in on this; if the head of F&A had been involved, it would have been near impossible to discover anything. I think. But at the very least, she was more worried about deflecting blame for budget irregularities than getting to the bottom of why they were occurring. In KHOU’s excerpts from the Muni channel, she can be seen diverting Goldberg from inquiries about the increased budget by wandering off into minutiae of how much copies cost. Visibly frustrated, he dropped that line of inquiry and delved into the pay budgeted for temp employees… of which they had none.

“It was all doublespeak,” said former Councilman Mark Goldberg, referring to the justifications given last summer for increasing the office’s spending. “It was all a lie.”

And one it looks like you tried to get to the bottom of. Once again, term limits bite us on the ass; by the time someone learns enough to ask the right questions, they’re limited right out of office.

On the other hand, we’ve got better numbers on exactly what was going on in the pro tem’s office and the other council members:

Twenty other council employees, by comparison, received bonuses in the last two years ranging from $1,000 to $8,500, according to documents city officials released Thursday.
All of them, however, were approved by council members, and the highest annual bonus amount was still less than half of the smallest received by any of the four pro tem employees.

Ah, excellent. This mess is answering so many questions I’ve had for a while now. We finally know just how well they treat their aides. Let me be clear: over eight thousand dollars in bonus money only looks small in comparison to the Gang of Four’s depredations. That’s still an insane amount in bonus money from the point of view of city rank and file employees, who can expect to see the same bonus on their paycheck every payday: $0.00.

I bet we’ll be hearing from the unions about that, real soon now.

  1. SEIU
  2. AFSCME

Oh, wait, they probably think it’s a bad idea to draw attention to employee malfeasence, even when it’s enabled by a culture of favoritism and lack of oversight. Never mind. Moving right along. . .

The records also gave a more detailed accounting of the pro tem employees’ bonuses. Previous totals were compiled from 2005 payroll records. The employees also received one bonus in 2004 and another in 2006, bringing the total to $143,500, according to the records.

Ah, but we’re not done yet…. Let’s look back a little further:

Under former Mayor Pro Tem Jew Don Boney, she said, the budget had topped $300,000.

A Mayor Pro Tem who was appointed by former Mayor Outta Town Brown. With the number of officials from that administration already in deep kimchee and the bonuses they got just before leaving office, perhaps we need to be digging a little deeper, eh?

Additional commentary at BlogHouston.

Smithers! Unleash the Auditors!

I was wondering how long it would take. The first knife has come out, and it’s exactly who you’d expect it to be from!

City council member Shelly Sekula-Gibbs is calling for an independent audit of all departments affected. In a memo obtained Thursday, Sekula-Gibbs made an official request, and offered $10,000 from her council office’s budget to help pay for the audit.

Oh, yeah baby. I wonder what Ms. Alvarado is calling her tonight? I had missed that she was even offering money out of her own budget.

I just hope that by “all departments” she means council member offices too, but I doubt it. If she does, look for her proposal to gain minimal support. It looks like the need may really be there for it though:

KPRC found a document signed by Alvarado in late 2004 that granted Hernandez and Watkins significant financial authority. It may not have been intended to let the group give raises to each other, but it made it easier, the station reported.

.

Raises Plus Bonuses

Ok, I’ve looked at the latest Chronicle article. There’s a few things I could snark about, but in keeping with my earlier resolution, I’m just going to point out the highlights. There were raises in addition to the bonuses, but now we know the amounts of their base pay before and after the raises. And I have to say, the raises might have been merited, if not to the extent that they were given. The pay of Christopher Mays caught my eye: He is an Administrative Specialist, (i.e., mid-rank paper pusher with no supervisory duties, but important responsibilities nonetheless). This is about the rank I’d expect to find in an office that supports council members and their staff.

The problem is, before the raises he was three pay grades higher than me, but making $3k less. That’s….screwed up, even for the city. HR should never have allowed that to happen. Believe me, I’m not overpaid; my raise when I got bumped up a pay grade was less than 3%. His $26k salary was woefully inadequate, but I know what caused it: HR penalizes employees who jump too many pay grades at once. His prior job was in Public Works, I believe as a pay grade 13 or 14 (seven or six grades lower than he is now), but he had the connections to make the jump to the pro tem’s office. Only HR won’t allow anyone to recieve a huge % pay increase, even if they jump several pay grades. They give only a “small” increase. Although I don’t know his actual pay amount prior to the jump, I’d peg it in the area of $24k. So it was about a 20% pay increase. This seems large, but it may not have put him in the bottom end of the pay grade, i.e. his pay was so low it could have been less than the minimum for his position.

Continue reading

Ok, Back on the Meds

Looking back over my posts from yesterday, here and in the comments of other blogs, I think I got in touch with my inner snark or something. Maybe even my boojum. Six posts! Granted 3 of them were written the night before, but still… sheesh.

After some consideration, I think I should probably tone it down a little bit. It wouldn’t do to annoy too many people in high places. Though it really would help me achieve this goal if no one working in City Hall says anything especially stupid today.

Darn. This is not going to be easy…

On Tape

Update: KHOU moved the link to the tapes off the front page, so I have updated my link accordingly.
KHOU has three tapes taken by the muni channel during the 2005 budget workshop. Goldberg is asking some tough questions of the F&A director; Carol Alvarado is also offering some explanations. I don’t know if it’s just the advantage of knowing there was something screwy, but these answers don’t sound right to me. Now I can see some of the questions stumping Ms. Johnson, such as “What professional memberships are we paying for?” That’s actually a difficult ‘detail’ question. But others just had my bullshit detector going off.

But where alarm bells should have been going off all over the city was during this exchange. Ms. Alvarado is speaking of the pro tem’s office handling the budget for the individual members’ offices:

The problem we’ve been seeing is that F&A would have one budget and one set of numbers and the pro tem office would have another and there were quite a few discrepancies

Continue reading

The Apology

Following is the text of the apolgoy delivered by councilmember and Mayor pro tem Carol Alvarado in today’s City Council meeting, thanks to KTRK.

“Mayor and colleagues, I would like to take a brief moment to comment on the recent events in the Mayor Pro Tem Office.

Serving as Mayor Pro Tem is an honor and a privilege that I assure you, I do not take lightly. I would never do anything to jeopardize the integrity of this position or to compromise the essential services the office provides. Like everyone here, I was shocked at the reports of payroll irregularities.

I want to apologize for any disruptions this investigation may have caused in how we conduct the business of this council. We have re-staffed the Mayor Pro-Tem office and we are doing our best to continue to operate with minimal distractions.

I also want to reiterate that I fully support the OIG’s investigation. Like everyone else, I am eager to determine what really happened. We still don’t have all the information and shouldn’t speculate until the investigation is complete and we have all the facts.

I have been astonished and disappointed to discover how easy it was for someone — to forge my initials and steal both the taxpayers’ dollars and my personal reputation at the same time

As you can all imagine, the events of the past week have been a test of my spirit. I have had to deal with rumor, innuendo, and outright distortion of fact that I would never wish upon anyone, although, sadly, it could happen to you.

In this age of identity theft, we are all vulnerable and as public officials, we are perhaps even more at risk — dependent and trusting of our staff to help us get through every packed calendar day. Forgery is criminal and a form of identity theft that I hope none of you should ever have to endure.

I look forward to getting to the bottom of this situation, moving forward, and making sure it never happens again. Unfortunately, we have a process that is flawed. We need to review the procedures that have been in place and make the needed changes to implement foolproof systems and prevent future irregularities.

We also need to review oversight systems at every level so that no city employee is able to get away with this type of illegal activity over a prolonged period of time.

Thank you”

Ok, I read through it all, and I while I could fisk and snark my way through the whole steaming pile (this really belongs over at TBIFOC), I am just going to point out one thing and let it be.

Carol Alvarado apologized to her colleagues on the council. She did not apologize to the hard-working employees of the City of Houston, whose reputations she allowed her staff to tarnish, and she sure as hell didn’t apologize to her constituents in District I, or the rest of the taxpaying citizens of Houston, whom she has let down.

‘Nuff said.

Why Privatization Rarely Works

I’ve been tinkering with this column for some time now, but Sunday’s article over at Houston Strategies prompted me to pull it off the back burner and get it ready. Tony appears to be someone who gets it.

I’ve never understood why it’s bad for a company (i.e. “capital”) to abuse monopoly power to increase profits but good for labor to do the same thing.

Neither have I. But here’s where I went “OMG, he really gets it!”

As mayor, Goldsmith championed two ideas, privatization and competition. Privatization alone didn’t work, Goldsmith wrote, because private monopolies weren’t that much more efficient than public ones. So simply turning the water department over to a private company wouldn’t accomplish much. But if you could carve up the city into zones and let a number of providers (including city workers themselves) compete to haul garbage, tow abandoned cars, fix potholes and so on, wonderful and surprising things happened, Goldsmith found. Services improved, work processes were streamlined, productivity soared and costs declined dramatically.

Amazingly, city workers often turned out to be the high-quality, low-cost providers, once they were allowed to compete. “The problem,â€? Goldsmith wrote in his book, “is that [municipal employees] have been trapped in a system that punishes initiative, ignores efficiency and rewards big spenders.â€? A system … well, like San Diego city government.

Or Houston’s.

Continue reading

Podectomy on Aisle 3, Stat!

Podectomy, as in “surgical removal of the foot from the mouth.” Seems CM Alvarado is in need of one. (Edit: It’s pod- not ped-. Not trying to suggest a child should be removed from her mouth.) In an article in today’s Chronicle Matt Stiles reports that not only did Hernandez get $47,500 in unauthorized bonuses, she also gave herself unauthorized raises of $21k total.

As the probe continued, the city’s legal department provided documents Tuesday showing that Hernandez’s base salary went up about 37 percent with two raises in early 2005, from $57,000 to $78,000.

And this was paid for by upping the budget for the office of the pro tem.

“The justification cited was increased costs of services and supplies,” said Frank Michel, White’s spokesman. “We don’t have any written documentation.”

Alvarado, whose district office is separate from that of the pro tem, said the extra money was a “restoration” to levels in previous administrations. The pro tem budget remained $260,000 during the past three years, but was more than $300,000 in the past, she said.

If that’s a restoration, clearly we need to look more closely at how the office was handled under previous administrations, since the mayor appoints the pro tem. Let’s see, who was our previous mayor… oh yeah, Outta Town Brown. Who “took the money and ran” along with all his cronies at the end of his last term.

She said the increase this year was requested by her mayor pro tem office manager, Rosita Hernandez, one of four employees who received bonuses city officials say were unauthorized. Hernandez’s $47,500 in 2005 bonuses boosted her total pay to $125,500, among the highest in city government.

WTF? Your office manager requests ~45% funding increase, and you don’t even check into it?

“I’m looking for something in writing that justifies the restoration of funds,” Alvarado said. “I wish I had access to those documents.”

Lady, I wish you’d bothered to access them back then! We might not have such, er, entertainment now if you had. And I generally avoid criticizing individual council members but Ms. Alvarado, do yourself a favor. Stick the foot in far enough where you can’t talk any more.

“It’s my office. It’s my name,” she said. “I don’t know why this $50,000, or $60,000, is such a big issue.”

This whole article is just full of little tidbits like that. Definately a must-read. But I’m wondering if maybe her hoof-n-mouth problem is contagious:

Continue reading

What Do These Things Have In Common?

  1. Carol Alvarado
  2. SEIU

Well, I hope that not everyone was thinking this was going to be earthshaking news or bust an investigation wide open, because it’s not; to some, I suspect it’s not even news. But it is funny and (embarassing in some quarters) to note that what they have in common is each other.

This just came to my attention a couple of days ago, and I finally got my scanner back online:

SEIU endorses Alvarado and Parker

I suppose it’s just a humorous coincidence that half of their endorsements are involved to greater or lesser extent in the current Bonusgate investigation. Sue hasn’t had time to pass many bonuses out, after all.

On the other hand, the SEIU may consider it less humorous if it’s true that Alvarado herself is now under investigation. (Registration is required. I recommend this site.)

Continue reading

I’m With Glenn Reynolds. . .

Has Pres. Bush lost his freaking mind, as Instapundit suggests? If this is some kind of a stunt to sucker the Dems into a political mistake, I will annoint Karl Rove the greatest Machiavelli of all time.

This is the biggest WTF moment he’s given me since Harriet Miers. No, on second thought, at least I understood that one. Threatening to veto any attempt to even delay an arab country taking control of our ports is just out there.

But the more I think about it, the more I think I dismissed one possible theory too quickly. He’s got to be playing to the Arab street on this one. I mean, yeah there’s some dumbasses in his administration but no one is stupid enough to believe the public isn’t going to go bonkers over this. In one stroke, he’s just about guaranteed the entire deal will get scuttled, not just delayed. He’ll alienate tons of supporters, but then he’s not running for re-election.

Which is what makes me think he might just know what he’s doing, after all. But damn, we’re talking serious misunderestimation if that’s true, because my lead theory is still early senility.