Monthly Archives: October 2007

Aftermath of the Scam

This entry marks the first post in a new category “Rumor Control.” Information found in these posts is not verified, and accuracy may be lacking. Any opinion I express on its veracity is just that, opinion. It is mostly, as the category title says, rumor.

A little over a month ago, a story broke about Cheryl Jackson, a city employee in the water department, that was allegedly accepting bribes to give people non-existent city jobs. It seems that, aside from the damage that it did to employee reputations and morale, there have been some more lasting effects. Apparently, Ms. Jackson was not familiar to many of the employees in the building where she worked, as she was an evening or night-shift manager in the IT section. In this position, she had access to a mainframe system containing SSN’s and TDL’s of over 400,000 Houston residents, a nightmare-inducing headache for the COH. (Bear in mind that there is a big difference in having access to the system and having access to the data.) Apparently, she was also running a “credit repair” business on the side, and the way she came into contact with some of her victims may have been through her business.

The rather obvious possibility that she might have obtained their information and targeted victims through use of city resources has no doubt occurred to investigators. It will be interesting to see if anything on that comes out in the trial. Whenever that is. Prediction: considering that the Bonusgate 4 aren’t going on trial until conveniently after the November election, I bet that’s about the time Ms. Jackson will also be tried.

Apparently, she didn’t just take money and offer a fake class. The rumor mill has it that she actually brought people to her office and administered bogus drug tests! Not working during regular hours, she escaped the notice of senior managers, and other employees were not willing to challenge an assistant manager about bringing people into the building after hours. I don’t know about the drug tests, but the part about bringing people into the building is probably true, as management at 4200 Leeland has apparently cracked down on badge wearing, ordered formerly insecure doors to be kept closed, and now requires employee badges to enter the building (for employees anyway — customers can still walk in the front door.) Most employees are said to be supportive of the greater security, so at least that’s a positive.

Far more speculative and unverified are persistent rumors that management has initiated a thorough review of all applications and employee files, looking for discrepancies and/or obvious problems. (Well, at least as obvious as putting someone convicted of document tampering in a sensitive job.) At least one supervisor is said to have been terminated for a problem with their application. One version says the person lied about prior employment. Alternate rumors say it was a random drug test that got him or her. Veracity: unknown.

An unrelated security issue is the new temp hiring agency that opened next door. Apparently, there have been problems with its “not-employees” trying to park inside the city’s gated lot, urinating in public, and accosting city employees.

That’s all I’ve got for now folks.

Rumor Control

Well, here I go being barely active again. I really haven’t been “into” regular blogging lately; even my anime blog is suffering. I have all these ideas during the day, and when I get home, it’s like all the determination has been sucked out of me. If my home is activating my lazy streak, maybe I should move?

Nah… too much work.

More seriously: As I’ve written Houblog over the last 3 years, I’ve tried to ensure that I have reported factual data. Whenever possible, I’ve posted links to source material, or posted scans of original documents. My rule of thumb has always been, if I can’t verify it (and obscure the origin enough to keep myself and any source off the hotseat) I won’t write about it. From time to time, I pick up bits and pieces of information that I just can’t verify. Most often, this is because I can’t investigate enough to verify, without drawing attention to myself at work. (Needless to say, the only place I want attention because of the blog is on the blog.) And sometimes there isn’t any original source material. So I’ve let these go by, even when I wanted to write about them badly. I’m sure that’s cost me a lot of potential posts over the last few years.

Starting tomorrow, I’m going to change that policy. I’m establishing a new topic: “Rumor Control.” Items under this topic/category should not be considered 100% accurate. In fact, they may be completely inaccurate, and they’re definitely unverified. All they are is what I have picked up from the grapevine, nothing more, and nothing less. Not personal gossip; I have no interest in that, and if you’re the type that does, you’re reading the wrong blog anyway. If I have a sense of the rumor’s veracity, I’ll indicate what I think of it, but that’s about the limit.

I think they’ll be of occasional interest. At the very least, they’ll be mildly diverting. Tomorrow morning, I’ll post the first of these….about the fallout behind the firing of a Utility Customer Service assistant manager who was scamming people.

In the meantime, I’d like to leave you with a line heard in a (probably union financed) commercial supporting COH employees:

“The guy scooping out your sewer makes less than the guy scooping your Ben & Jerry’s ice cream!”

Edit: Let me make it clear, the new category is for the purpose of reporting items that I feel it may be in the public interest for them to be spotlighted. It is not for the purpose of airing “dirty laundry” or gossip.