Monthly Archives: March 2008

CBS’ Latest Sins

Crossposted from my comment over at blogHOUSTON:

I’m furious with CBS news again. How this network is still in business after trying to throw a national election is something I can’t explain.

What’s got me glaring at CBS news this time is last week’s coverage of the “5th anniversery” of the Iraq war. It’s not a local subject per se, so I wasn’t in any hurry to blog it here; while the WOT is one of the motivations for starting this blog, I long ago quit opining on it, since there are people much more qualified and influential to handle that job.

But this time, I’ve got to kick in some commentary or blow up in anger. I figured someone else would cary the load, but I haven’t even seen any backlash on this, which makes me wonder… have we just come to accept left-wing ideology and attacks from the media, to the point that we don’t even blink an eye anymore? I’m really angry over their use of the children of deceased soldiers to attack the war, compounded by the commentator saying that children of military personnel shouldn’t play dress-up in their parent’s uniforms. Oh, the horror! The son or daughter of a doctor, a fireman, or a policeman, maybe… but a soldier?

“We’ve all seen children play dress-up in their parent’s clothing…but it should never be like this.” Cue picture of a father and daughter, both in military fatigues, standing in front of a mirror. (emphasis in original. I wish I could replicate the sound of horror and disgust in the newsman’s voice.)

How DARE they suggest that the children of military personnel shouldn’t be proud of their parents and seek to emulate them? The next time one of their precious reporters gets nabbed in Iraq by a bunch of crazies with guns, who’s going to come save their asses? The Boy Scouts?

Oh, wait, I forgot. Al-Queda-Not-in-Iraq-and-Never-Was-Unless-It’s-America’s-Fault doesn’t kidnap allies.

Then this morning, they had to start off an interview with the governor of Illinois (about his endorsement of Obama) with a completely unrelated attack on the war, and the 4,000th casualty.

No, I’m not questioning their patriotism — they don’t have any.

I wonder if anyone TIVO’d that clip and put it on YouTube? Probably been threatened and forced to take it down by now…

Houston Housing Authority

Well, they’re at it again, the one department that continues to embarrass the city only somewhat less than the HPD Crime Lab. This time, the Houston Housing Authority is holding hostage all the remaining worldly possessions of several elderly immigrants, for the “best” of reasons, of course.

Back in November, the Bellerieve apartments, had a four-alarm fire, which destroyed several units and left 2o0 homeless. From the KHOU article, dated 11/27/07, the day of the fire:

More than a dozen Red Cross Caseworkers met Tuesday with elderly residents displaced by Monday’s four-alarm apartment fire… The Houston Housing Authority has placed the residents in hotels and is providing meals for them. About 150 rooms are occupied by these residents at the Hilton in southwest Houston.

Well here it is months later, and I have to ask if they are still in hotel rooms or if they’ve found other places to stay, because the apartments aren’t repaired yet. In fact, the building hasn’t even been cleared of the tenants’ possessions — unless it’s been by thieves. The KHOU report was somewhat light on details, like exactly how many residents are affected, but obviously repairs are nowhere near beginning, since HHA isn’t letting some or all of the tenants back in to retrieve their clothes and personal items four months after the blaze. Why?

Asbestos, it says.

Abatement of the units and cleaning of all the items has to be done before they can be returned to their owners. The HHA insists that since the items belong to the tenants, the tenants have to pay to have their stuff cleaned. “But wait,” you say, “why isn’t the landlord responsible? Or the landlord’s insurer? Aren’t they responsible for such costs?”

Ah, therein lies the rub. You see, the Houston Housing Authority is the landlord, and, as mentioned in today’s report, it blames the tenants for not having the money to get their goods back:

The money would pay for the asbestos cleanup, which is required to salvage their personal belongings left inside. Housing officials say that could cost up to $3,400 per unit.. “People would normally have renter’s insurance. The fact of the matter is the Housing Authority’s insurance does not cover tenant’s content,” said Horace Allison, the housing authority’s vice president.

As I said, the tenants are elderly, and some are immigrants. KHOU only found those to interview today, although from the November article it is clear that the residents were, ah, largely multi-cultural. Interestingly, the text of the article posted on the website cuts off just before what I found to be the most interesting part of the televised report.

Under Brown, the entire Housing Department appeared to be little more than “one director’s personal fiefdom” and the waste and mismanagement (if not outright fraud) were so bad, the Federal government is now demanding a refund of $15 million it says the department misused or wasted. A private owner would have the whole place cleaned up, repaired, and back in business by now, because time is money. But the City unelected HHA doesn’t care about a boarded-up eyesore, so we have four months passed while the personal effects of the tenants were still under lock and key. (We hope. Far more likely that they and 2/3 of the building’s wiring have long departed the premises.) Still something didn’t seem right; an element of the story had to be missing. This entire affair seemed beyond even HHA’s normal level of indifference to the very people it is supposed to be housing.

Then the televised report (but again, not the article) continued by saying that the HHA is “doing what it can” by meeting with the tenants next week; in fact, they are going to bring them together with some companies that do asbestos abatement and see if they can get the companies to give them a group discount.

I had maybe a fraction of a second to appreciate the generosity of the City of Houston HHA for going out of their way to persuade some private businesses to charge a little less to people that shouldn’t be paying at all. Then my finely tuned BS detector went off “Some companies? What companies, and how were they chosen? Given the Department’s checkered history of late, and the City’s obvious favoritism towards politically connected parties where property is concerned, a cynic like myself should be excused for wondering if drumming up customers for someone’s business is what this was all about from the get-go.

Perhaps the tenants should count themselves lucky the building doesn’t have lead paint, another thing the City something HCDD seems to trip over a lot. On the other hand, the building was built in 1975, so maybe that’s a forlorn hope, given the department’s city’s laxness regarding lead paint inspections.

UPDATE: After Kevin dropped me a line asking me to cross-post this at blogHOUSTON, I did so, and added some more questions that occurred to me, plus a couple of extra bits of snark. Then this afternoon, on of the blogHOUSTON readers (and the Chronicle itself, strangely enough) pointed out a glaring error in the article: I’d assumed that the HHA was a part of the City of Houston. It’s not –. although the Mayor does appoint the board…

From the Chron:

Both agencies provide housing to low- and moderate-income families, but they do this through different programs and services. Both receive most of their funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and both have experienced considerable conflict and controversy.

I suppose that at least the Chronicle appreciated the chance for a little payback, given the number of times bH have criticised them in the past. It certainly is apparent that they’re keeping a close eye on bH….

Oh, and check out the HHA’s front page today:

Bellerive Apartment Update!
There was a lot of activity taking place at the Bellerive Apartments recently. Residents were able to return briefly, after a major fire blazed through the apartment complex leaving over 200 senior residents displaced from their homes. Residents have retrieved some of their personal belongings from their apartments. Remodeling and reconstruction of the property will soon begin at the high-rise. Bellerive residents or Caretakers with questions or concerns can call the HHA Management Company at Bellerive (713) 789-5000.

TGIF?

It’s Friday, the day that our local newsmakers traditionally try to bury stories by releasing them at 4:49 pm. What’s your guess for an important shocker to be buried today? (Sorry, appointment of the interim DA is off the table; that’s already happened.)

Tentative Contract Agreement

The following e-mail just appeared in my mailbox.

Joint Email to City of Houston Employees

City of Houston and HOPE Reach Tentative Agreement on Contract

We are pleased to announce that the City of Houston and the Houston Organization of Public Employees (HOPE) have reached a tentative agreement in contract negotiations. This agreement reflects our mutual commitment to delivering quality public services to all Houston residents while ensuring fair compensation for every city worker.

The proposed agreement runs for three years and takes effect after it has been ratified by HOPE members and approved by the Houston City Council. Highlights of the agreement include:

– Guaranteed raises for every year of the contract for municipal employees.

– Additional performance-based compensation based principally on Employee Performance Evaluations.

– A minimum wage of $10 an hour for every city worker by September 2009, with an immediate minimum of $9.50 an hour.

– A freeze on the percentage of health care premiums paid by employees.

The first step in making this historic agreement a reality begins with the important process of approval and ratification by city employees. From March 6 to March 20, HOPE will be holding informational meetings about the contract at worksites across the city. All municipal employees will be allowed 1 hour to attend these meetings to learn more about the contract. At the close of each meeting, voting will take place. Voting will also be held at the HOPE office. To view a complete schedule of sessions, click here

Sincerely,

Mayor Bill White
City of Houston

Norm Yen
President of HOPE

Ok, now down to the quibbling. Continue reading

SAP: Performing “As Intended, Not As Anticipated”

It seems that the city’s annual financial report will be a bit late this year, thanks to SAP. Four months late, to be precise. Emphasis added below.

Departmental delays caused by the city’s unexpectedly difficult transition to a new financial system will postpone the release of this year’s financial report until at least April 30, City Controller Annise Parker has announced.

The FY07 CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) was due December 31. Departments enter data on an ongoing basis then produce annual reconciliations, which are then routed through the Controller’s Office for analysis and consolidation before going to Deloitte, the city’s audit firm.

“I am both personally frustrated and professionally concerned by the problems. While the city’s underlying financial situation is strong, our inability to make a smooth transition from the old legacy financial system to the new SAP system definitely has had an impact, particularly during a time of volatile financial markets,” the controller said.

The FY06 report was produced during the transition to the new SAP system. Many employees put in double duty during this trying time, resulting in delays in that CAFR as well.

The FY07 CAFR is the first produced entirely on the new system. The controller said departments were overly optimistic in projecting how long it would take to train employees in the system and to scrub the converted data.

I’m not even going to comment on “scrub the data” because even in the old system, there would have to be some scrubbing. If there’s one thing that I’ve learned, Garbage In, Garbage Out is true. Of course, these days, I tend to say “Garbage In, Dynamo Out” but then, I’m biased against folks that “don’t want to be fools.”

And now for the scary part.

SAP PROMOTES HOUSTON

Ironically, SAP has touted the city’s conversion as one of its smoothest. The SAP system has performed as intended, but not always as anticipated. It has been a steep learning curve, . which has escalated costs,” she said.SAP, the an (fixed that for you –ubu) industry standard, can be modified up-front for clients or clients can change processes to customize the software. The city’s transition team opted to change city processes. This involved about 2,000 employees who interact with the system. The controller noted that creating additional reports and data extraction has proven to be difficult and time-consuming.

Because SAP is such a PITA that it’s easier to retrain your workforce than customize the software. It amuses me to think of that as a caricature of corporate facism. “Your business vill operate per our model, or ve vill not zupport chu! You von’t like it eef ve do not zupport chu!”

“The biggest problem is converting data from the old system to SAP. This has resulted in significant delays as departments attempt to report accurate fixed assets. Data due last fall still has not been received,” she said.

Four months late, eh? And counting… Well, no, I’m still not a fan of SAP. I’m sure that Mayor White has no objection to foes’ inability to look at the record and deconstruct his paper shuffle after gutting Proposition 2. Where is that $90 million over cap for police protection, anyway?

Oh, silly me, he didn’t say $90 million in additional police spending, did he? Well, maybe Controller Parker will get it figured out by the end of June, when the 2008 fiscal year ends….

Parker Shows Up

City Controller Annice Parker finally gets involved in the debate.

“My first concern is for the land acquisition. While there has been public speculation about the use of the land, the request for council action identifies no specific public purpose. That is backward public policy,” the controller stated. “The city is not in the land speculation business. Council should know for what purpose the land will be used.”

“TIRZ dollars are property taxes. This is a legitimate use of TIRZ monies, but to say there will be no public dollars, or tax dollars, used for this purchase is simply inaccurate,” she said.

“I am concerned about the use of public utility revenues to help make this deal possible. Our water and sewer customers should not be helping to subsidize a professional sports facility, no matter how much we want it,” the controller said.

Just so you know, your water and sewer rates will be going up 1.8% in April, whether or not this passes. And the Zoo Development Corporation will still get their service for free.

Edit: Hat tips to Off the Kuff and blogHouston.